Sun tries to outdo Linux
- Reduce text size Decrease text size
- Increase text size Increase text size
- Print article Print
- Jump to comments Comment
- Share this article Share
- Email article to a friend Email
Sun has made its Solaris operating system free and promises to open up its source code. Can that revive the server giants Unix business?
Sun Microsystems might be pitching Solaris 10 as "10 moves ahead", but the server vendor still has some convincing to do if customers are to make those moves.
At Solaris 10's public unveiling in November, Sun made it clear that there is a lot riding on this latest iteration of its Unix-based operating system. It has been 3,000 man-years and $500 million in the making, and analysts are saying its 600 new features make it the biggest leap forward for Solaris since the mid-1990s. Most crucially, though, after over a decade of charging big bucks for Solaris licences, Sun has decided to give all this away for free.
Instead of licence fees, it hopes to make money on maintenance and support contracts charged on a subscription model. Sun likens the approach to a mobile phone contract, where the handset is given away for free in order to provide a constant revenue stream from the use of the service.
Whether Sun will make money on this is still up for debate, but experts argue that many of the Solaris 10 features are certainly worth paying for - albeit indirectly. Solaris now has "military-grade" security built in as standard.
| ||
Such functionality puts it above Linux and both HP and IBM's Unix flavours, says Thompson. This Solaris release could allow Sun to corner the proprietary Unix market currently led by IBM, he adds, agreeing with Sun executives that IBM's AIX and HP-UX will wither as their parent companies throw themselves deeper into the Linux community.
Free Solaris
Sun is drawn to Linux's collaborative development process, which means development costs are significantly lowered, even if that means giving up intellectual property ownership.
But Sun is promising to go down that route too - at least some of the way. The company says it will open up Solaris' source code to community development, but its aim is to keep Solaris intact. As a result, it is unlikely to release the software under the standard open source licence, the GPL, which would allow elements of Solaris to be cannibalised by Linux.
While its enthusiasm for the open source community may be limited, Sun is significantly upping its attempts to woo Linux users. It is doing everything it can to smooth the passage of Linux users (back) to Sun: making the cost structure identical and allowing Linux applications to run natively on Solaris via its Janus emulation software. Like the Roman god, Sun is attempting to face both ways by acknowledging the power of Linux while competing with it head on, rather than taking the IBM or HP route - a braver, if riskier, strategy.
Existing Sun customers are likely to take analysts' advice and upgrade, and the advanced functionality may well cause some churn within the proprietary Unix arena. But Sun's real target with this new release is to halt the migration of those running Solaris on its own SPARC chipset to Linux on Intel's x86 line - the cheaper alternative which users claim has the ability to avoid the kind of vendor lock-in they experience on Sun's proprietary platforms.
When Sun says it is targeting Linux, however, it means it is principally targeting Linux's leading vendor, Red Hat. Thompson believes that the partnership of IBM and SuSE, the world's second largest Linux vendor (and European leader), is too solid to challenge, while HP's Linux customers, mostly using the Debian distribution, do not offer a sufficiently large opportunity. But by moving to a support-only subscription model, Sun has put itself on a level footing with Red Hat in terms of price comparisons. The resulting competitive fray will make fascinating viewing.
Gartner analysts have accused Sun of being a company "with no plan A but lots of plan Bs". The grand design of using free Solaris to save its Unix server business looks suspiciously like a 'plan A'. But this time, there is no fall back position, as moving aggressively into the x86/Linux server market will not provide it with the necessary differentiation or volume to take on and beat IBM, HP or Dell.
