Budgets down, prices plummet
- Reduce text size Decrease text size
- Increase text size Increase text size
- Print article Print
- Jump to comments Comment
- Share this article Share
- Email article to a friend Email
It's the best market ever for technology buyers. Budgets may be down, but prices have dropped even further.
JP Rangaswami is CIO of investment bank Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein. He controls a $1.5 billion IT budget, one of the largest in Europe. However, Rangaswami wants to reduce that budget by 5% every year for the next five years. In 2002,
| ||
IT decision-makers like Rangaswami are in a tremendous position of power. IT budgets remain flat or in some cases have even been reduced from their levels of 18 months ago, yet the market for technology has been squeezed to such an extent that many areas of IT investment - whether hardware, software or services - have experienced a dramatic fall in price. For those organisations that are willing to continue investing in technology, this new cost baseline has created an extraordinary opportunity.
"It's the best market ever for technology buyers," says Michael Fleischer, CEO of analyst group Gartner. "We need to make the most of the current situation - we're looking at pricing and terms now that will disappear in the next 12 to 24 months." The sort of terms Fleischer is talking about make for interesting reading. The CIO of one major telecommunications provider in the UK says that he has seen a 60% decrease in the fees the company pays to major IT consultancies - a consultant that used to cost £5,000 a week now costs £2,000. Meanwhile, a number of the enterprise software vendors offer deep discounts on software licences, in some cases as much as 60% or 70% (see box).
Colin Saunders, IT director of UK bakery Warburtons has been on the receiving end of these kinds of deals, particularly from vendors he has dealt with in the past. These vendors realise his budget is squeezed, but don't want to lose a longstanding customer. "Sometimes [these deals] have been incentives to stop us looking around [for alternative suppliers] and sometimes they're just to stimulate our thinking and bring projects forward. We have also been offered fantastic deals on software licences and have bought and banked some just because we were approaching our year-end," he explains.
Bargain hunt
This bargain hunt mentality is in stark contrast to two or three years ago, when IT spending was growing substantially faster than the rest of the global economy, and many technology consultants were paid highly inflated fees. "What's happened is that the vendors used to have massive power because there was such a demand for technology. They've lost that leverage so lots of products and services have been forced into commoditisation," says Howard Rubin, vice president of research at analyst company Meta Group. "Companies used to need the newest technology to run their systems. Now there's so much excess capacity that the demand's not there anymore." Furthermore, adds Rubin, technology replacement cycles have increased. Companies are refreshing desktop systems every four or five years instead of three, while server replacement cycles are as long as seven years.
Faced with this abrupt slowdown in spending and technology refresh, vendors are becoming ever more creative in how they win deals. In consultancy, many of the big names now hire out consultants at cost - so a full-time consultant may be earning $100,000 a year, but the company is hiring him or her out to clients at $50 an hour instead of the $200 that consultant used to command. In software, some companies are offering finance deals either directly or through their value added resellers (VARs). German enterprise resource planning software giant SAP, for example, has a scheme that enables VARs to secure bank loans so they can offer 'buy now, pay later' deals to customers.
Finally, a number of recruitment agencies that hire out developers and support staff now offer risk sharing deals - if a project is not completed by an agreed time to an agreed standard, the agency will absorb any additional costs. This avoids 'maverick spend' on contractors or paying inflated overtime rates.
Buyer power
Technology buyers, at the same time, are in a better position to negotiate than ever. Michael Whitby, sourcing director at news organisation Reuters, for example, was able to negotiate a 20% reduction in contractor rates based on
| ||
These cost reductions are not limited to home turf, either. Many organisations are looking at offshore outsourcing in a bid to reduce their cost base even further. Jim Davis, IT director of Thames Water, says his company has trimmed 20% of its application support and maintenance budget by farming these functions out to Indian outsourcing company Wipro. Anothercompany, Venda (which has licensed and now sells the technology that underpinned the defunct boo.com online shopping portal), has outsourced all of its front-end application development work to a contractor group in Vietnam, creating savings of 50%.
However, despite this shift in power structure between suppliers and buyers, the act of forcing through dramatic changes to a company's technology infrastructure or skills base may prove risky. Any organisation could place an advertisement in the classified section of a technology magazine and recruit the same number of staff they have in place now but at a vastly reduced rate, says Phil Redding, regional business director at Reed Technology Group, an IT recruitment consultancy, "but the disruption and risk in hiring new contractors would mean you'd spend your savings just in the exercise".
Given the level of savings some IT managers have already made, this risk may prove worth taking. But where does the money go? In most cases, straight back into the business. "We don't spend more money in IT just because we have managed within budget," insists Jon Marchant, an IT director at credit card company Capital One. "If we are able to execute our strategy more efficiently, any savings made go back into a central pot for the business as a whole to decide on." Roy Perry, acting CIO of US-based disk storage vendor StorageTek agrees: "It's difficult to justify any major spend in the current environment," he says.
Without doubt, the victims of the new cost baseline are the vendors themselves. Howard Rubin of the Meta Group points out that 2002 was the first year in thirty years of the technology industry that absolute dollar spend on IT went down as well as IT spend as a percentage of overall company revenues. "The situation is problematic because people remember what the prices used to be. Any vendor that starts to raise prices can only do this if demand truly exceeds supply - that's the only way they'd be able to justify it," he says.
In the meantime, technology buyers can make the most of the reset cost base and ensure they are well prepared for when the tables turn again.
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||





