Information Age: News, analysis & insight for IT & business leaders

 

Mail order

10 February 2006  

The technologies that are helping organisations confront the email management headache head on.

Yesterday over 35 billion emails were sent and received around the globe; by this time next year another 5 billion will be hitting mailboxes daily.

 
 

The future of email management

  • Small, specialised suppliers: Vendors in this space that have so far had competitive advantage or large installed bases will be acquired during the next three years. Corporate interest in best-of-breed, anti-spam solutions has given a boost to this category, but this success will diminish rapidly as competitive differential evaporates. Small vendors that offer monitoring and reporting tools are most at risk of incursion by IBM, Microsoft, and the large management console vendors' activities.

    This category can be further segmented into vendors that supply suites of tools. These small suite suppliers generally have a long history in the market and have grown slowly via acquisition during the past several years (for instance, Tumbleweed with Worldtalk, IntelliReach with Melia, and Clearswift with Content Technologies). Such vendors will continue to be the leaders in offering a broad spectrum of unified email management services for the next three years, extending services into the archival and supervision markets. However, by 2006/7, they will face significant challenges from both the console vendors and mid-sized general-purpose suppliers.

  • Medium-sized, general-purpose vendors: With their capital and sales channels, these vendors (Quest, NetIQ, SurfControl and others) will have the broadest market success starting in 2005. Large installed bases and broad geographic coverage will give them the opportunity to up-sell broader management portfolios (for databases, directories, instant messaging (IM), browsers, etc.) to existing customers.

    This category may be further segmented into suppliers with strong anti-virus businesses. These vendors have been slow to recognise the opportunity to expand their presence at the email perimeter into areas beyond virus control. Each of the big three virus firms has rudimentary content blocking capabilities and is attempting to move into the spam-blocking market via acquisition (for example, NAI with its buy-out of Deersoft), partnership (Trend Micro resells Postini's heuristics), or in-house development (as at Symantec). We believe these virus-blocking vendors will be slow to package complete email management services, but they will supply virus and 'SPAM signatures', for example, to more comprehensive email management vendors.

  • Larger, general-purpose management console suppliers: These enterprise console vendors will not follow a common path. IBM and Microsoft are expected to invest heavily in reporting and monitoring services for their respective email platforms, in an effort to boost revenues from slowing, per-seat system revenue growth. IBM will focus mostly on Domino/Workplace monitoring, and Microsoft will do the same with Exchange, while also focusing on perimeter management by adding virus and other hygiene services to its IMS database gateway. Console vendors without email systems - BMC and HP - will offer limited functionality (mostly monitoring services) to round out comprehensive management portfolios. CA is expected to focus on broader perimeter management concerns, encompassing email, IM, and Web browsing.

    Source: Meta Group

     
  •  
    And that firehose, as market watcher IDC puts it, is not going to be turned off any time soon, as person-to-person emails are joined by the ever-growing volumes of spam and email alerts and notifications. By 2006, the daily delivery will be 60 billion emails.

    As individuals have come to depend on the speed, reliability and borderless nature of email, it has become the preferred form of business communication. Indeed, a recent survey by the Meta Group found that 80% of business people choose to use email rather than the phone even for internal communication.

    But that universal adoption has thrown up some major challenges for IT management.

    Email is soaking up corporate bandwidth and consuming vast volumes of storage - and those many terabytes are growing at over 60% a year, according to storage industry group SNIA. Organisations are under legal and regulatory pressures to archive more and more email - in some cases for a few years, in others for decades. Email security is also a major concern, as the need to protect against email-borne viruses and other malicious code, and demand for emails to be protected using encryption grows. At the same time, IT managers need to enforce email policies that ensure compliance with legal and human resources issues that stems from the circulation of inappropriate content.

    Growing burden

    That translates into a hefty cost per user. According to industry research by Gartner, spend on email management at large companies is running at around $1,600 per user per year. The email management burden has also given rise to a whole ecosystem of software and services companies whose products are designed to eliminate at least some of the associated pain, cost and risk.

    While most of these vendors have traditionally tackled one or a couple of aspects of email management, customer are now asking for more comprehensive email management suites - something that has triggered a rush of consolidation.

    Today, says Meta, because the email management industry is made up of many small, niche suppliers, organisations are being forced to stitch together a portfolio of technologies from multiple vendors. Over the next four years, all that will change as the sector consolidates around six to nine large vendors each offering a broad range of email management services (see box, The future of email management).

    A handful of examples underscore the move. In the last year, systems and security management software vendor NetIQ has acquired Marshal Software with its MailMarshal email filtering, monitoring and encryption tools and also bought PentaSafe, a specialist in policy management software; NetIQ's rival Network Associates has snapped up Spam Assassin with its acquisition of Deersoft; and email security software company ClearSwift has added Baltimore Technologies' MimeSweeper and PornSweeper content filtering packages.

    But acquisitions elsewhere are also closely related to the growth of email, including storage market leader EMC's takeover of back-up and archiving specialist Legato, which offers EmailXtender, a policy-based system that automatically collects, organises, retains and retrieves email messages and attachments; and content management software vendor Documentum has bought archiving and retrieval software specialist TrueArc.

    Regulation-driven

    As that points to, email archiving and retrieval has become one of the fastest growing segments as email messages have become the most prevalent document and record type.

    Specialist in this area include KVS and Ixos, but with greater pressure to retain email records, the larger content management companies such as Documentum, FileNet and iManage have added modules to their existing offerings to address that requirement.

    Traditional archiving packages have simply written emails to disk, tape and optical storage, but increasingly that does not provide the kind of audit trail regulatory authorities are demanding.

    One vendor tackling this issue is EMC. Its Centera content addressed storage (CAS) system has been specifically developed for records or 'fixed content'.

     

    Email management at a glance

    Archival and retrieval systems provide the intelligence needed to correctly store a message. They can determine and analyse information about the content of a message and the way it was generated. Archival systems consist of: a server to host the software; a storage device (fast or slow disk, nearline and offline tape); an archival file system; and a management package. Vendors include KVS and Ixos.

    Spam protection currently comes in two deployment models - a hosted model or an on-premises gateway approach. Both typically scan emails before entering an organisation in order to weed out unsolicited or junk email. Spammers are known to be clever in their approach to sending unsolicited email, which means that companies should implement a broad anti-spam approach, including trusted-sender lists, blocked-sender lists, content filters, rule sets, reverse DNS lookups, and signatures. Vendors include: Trend Micro, Network Associates, Group Software, Surfcontrol, Symantec, Clearswift, CipherTrust, Marshall Software (NetIQ), MailFrontier, Tumbleweed and MessageLabs.

    Managed/hosted email services for internal end-user mailboxes is a market being driven by the desire for cost savings. Vendors such as Microsoft and Lotus are encouraging hosting programmes for both competitive as well as recurring revenue reasons. Outsourcing email operations may also be appealing because it can liberate IT personnel for assignment to more strategic projects. Vendors include: Zantaz, Iron Mountain, Mail.com, Critical Path, CommTouch, ThinkLink, USA.net and Sotware.com.

    Auto-response/self-service email solutions are typically focused towards customer-centric organisations and online retail operations. These are used to reduce the need to manually respond to email enquiries, and to route emails to correct customer service employees. The core feature is a hosted knowledge base that is applied to email content and is updated as online queries are made. Vendors include: RightNow, Transversal, Amacis, eGain and Avaya.

     
     
     
    CAS attaches a unique identifier to each email or piece of content, creating meta data that ensures faster retrieval. Centera deals with regulatory requirements through a WORM (write once, read many) system, which enables organisations to set business rules that address compliance. A typical rule may be that a company has a document retention period of four years. Once this is entered into the system, the document cannot be altered or deleted at any time within the four-year period. The WORM system checks these archived emails individually every 30 minutes to ensure that they have not been altered, thus ensuring against tampering, degradation or loss.

    Systems overload

    Securely retaining important emails is one pressing problem that IT staff can tackle directly; getting rid of or blocking unsolicited email is a very different challenge. The issues surrounding such 'spam' are well-documented. With over 30% of corporate email now spam, the inflow is soaking up corporate bandwidth and wasting staff time; the possibility of spam carrying viruses or other malicious code makes is a serious security threat; email is also the primary source by which offensive material enters the organisation, something that employers need (by law in some countries) to protect their staff against.

    Although demand for a solution to the spam avalanche gave rise to a clutch of specialist tools for screening emails and their content and deciding if they were spam, in many cases these are now part of wider suites that include anti-virus and email policy management functionality.

    Indeed, most of the large vendors of security software are now trying to address this onslaught with software or services that act as a filtering gateway that scans and removes spam. However, according industry insiders, while spam is of great interest to corporate boardrooms at the moment, it will not necessarily be the overriding concern for very long.

    "There are a lot of companies that are focusing on spam at the moment, but in 18 months this will not be the major issue," says Andy Burton, senior vice president at electronic content security company Clearswift. Burton suggests that companies that focus solely on spam blocking will find it hard to broaden out their portfolios, and will need to add clarification and analysis facilities to remain viable within a consolidating industry (see table, 'Top email concerns'). That optimism partly stems from various government initiatives in Europe and the US which aim to make spamming an offence unless the user has 'opted in' to the service.

    Email content tasting is being applied in a more constructive way elsewhere. Many organisations find themselves swamped by another kind of email - customer enquiries. The solution here has been to apply knowledge-based systems to the content to categorise the enquiry and to route it to the most appropriate service representative or, in some cases where the query is a common one, to answer it with a pre-determined response.

    Among the companies offering such services are RightNow Technologies and Transversal. Both have developed web self-service products which utilise knowledge-based systems to enable

     
     
    Top email concerns - 2003 and 2007
    2003     2007    
    1 Spam 1 Stability
    2 Storage 2 Security/hygiene
    3 Regulatory requirement 3 Centralisation
    4 Economic 4 Encrypted email
    5 Mailbox overload 5 Policy enforcement
    6 Upgrades 6 Mailbox overload
    7 Viruses 7 Mobility
    8 Mobility 8 Upgrades
    9 Security 9 Rightsizing
    10 Stability 10 Knowledge management
     
    organisations to answer questions posed to them automatically via their website or email. The systems (eService Center from RightNow and Metafaq from Transversal) answer pre-programmed FAQs (frequently asked questions), and augment the underlying database with each new question asked.

    RightNow customer, easyCar implemented the eService Centre system in November 2000 on a hosted basis. The company claims that prior to its introduction 95% of email customer requests were taking an unacceptable seven days to get answered. Within a month of its introduction, 95% of enquiries were being answered within 24 hours. Other customers have had a similar experience, including Polaroid and William Hill.

    As that illustrates, organisations are increasingly turning to hosted or managed email services for many facets of their email management. Though outsourced email services have not, in all cases, proven that they provide substantive reduction in costs, having email management handled by a specialist company does reduce the burden on internal IT departments and administrators. And given the unstoppable growth of email traffic, organisations need to take whatever opportunities they can find to lighten that management burden.


    Comments 

    There are currently no comments on this article

    People who read this also read...

    Platform Computing - Category winner

    Since 1992, Platform has established a reputation as an industry leader in High Performance Computing (HPC) management software, bringing the most powerful commercial HPC solutions to leading global enterprises.

     
    Advertisement

    White Papers

    Read article

    Developing ios Solutions for Business

    Whitepapers

    Quickly develop and deploy custom iPad and iPhone solutions. With FileMaker Pro, iPad and iPhone solutions can be prototyped and completed in hours or days versus weeks or months. No iOS application programming or design experience is required.

    Read article

    IDC Spotlight: Access Control and Certification

    Whitepapers

    Read this brief for best practices on managing user access compliance.

    Read article

    GPS World

    Whitepapers

    Is the PREMIER global media brand serving the exploding world of positioning and navigation for OEM, commercial and consumer applications.

    More
    div class="banner">