Information Age: News, analysis & insight for IT & business leaders

 
Information Age Blog

The sting in the tale of Dell’s outsourced supply chain

29 June 2010  

Pete Swabey

In this month’s issue of Information Age, as part of the cover feature on new models of outsourcing, we examined how computer maker Dell outsourced its global supplier engagement processes to business-to-business service provider Inovis.

The fact that Dell’s supply chain has in the past been credited with the company’s success, that the project was a combined IT and business process outsourcing deal, and that the technology platform used to support it was described as “the largest hosted B2B cloud environment in the world” – all these identified the project for inclusion in our analysis of new ways to outsource.

But it would be irresponsible for us not point out that since the publication of the article, Dell has drawn heavy criticism for its supplier engagement practices.

This week, the company was entered into the Forum of Private Business’ ‘Hall of Shame’ after it told certain suppliers that it would be extending the time it takes to pay them by 15 days to 65 days, citing economic circumstances.

“Companies like Dell have a responsibility to pay promptly,” said a spokesman for the Forum. “Failure to do so can mean the whole supply chain seizes up.”

The decision to lengthen the payment window was not, however, made by Inovis.

“The 65-day payment term is being put in place on a global basis for Dell’s non-production procurement, which includes vendors such as telecommunications companies, insurance companies, financial services, services vendors,” the hardware manufacturer said in a statement. “The standard does not apply to certain exempted diverse suppliers, including many certified small vendors, whose terms can be shorter, generally ranging from 20 to 45 days.”

So rather than an indictment of its outsourcing practices, the news is just one more minor PR crisis for Dell. It is not even the worst one this week: a story in yesterday’s New York Times alleges that between 2003 and 2006, the company knowingly sold thousands of faulty machines to customers including the University of Texas – where, twenty years prior, founder Michael Dell had first started selling PCs from his dorm room.

Still, it reminds us that when a large organisation makes fundamental changes to its business operations – like, for example, outsourcing – the repercussions often stretch far beyond the organisation itself.


Comments 

There are currently no comments on this article

People who read this also read...

 

White Papers

Read article

Developing ios Solutions for Business

Whitepapers

Quickly develop and deploy custom iPad and iPhone solutions. With FileMaker Pro, iPad and iPhone solutions can be prototyped and completed in hours or days versus weeks or months. No iOS application programming or design experience is required.

Read article

IDC Spotlight: Access Control and Certification

Whitepapers

Read this brief for best practices on managing user access compliance.

Read article

GPS World

Whitepapers

Is the PREMIER global media brand serving the exploding world of positioning and navigation for OEM, commercial and consumer applications.

More

Latest Posts

Your brain on Twitter

New science reveals that older brains may find social networking services distracting, but also that there are similarities between Twitter and the brain itself

Social judgment

Has the advent of the social network damaged the authority of Britain's legal system?

London’s tech future lies in the City

Playing on London's strengths – namely its reputation as global financial capital – would be the best way to support its technology industry

Reassessing Russia

Parallels CEO Sergei Beloussov sets the record straight on Russia's high tech potential

SpotlightOnSpend reacts to open criticism

Spend analysis software vendor Spikes Cavell responds to a blogger's excoriating analysis of its open data portal

Advertisement
Video ORSYP Survey Surveys
div class="banner">