In the frame
- Reduce text size Decrease text size
- Increase text size Increase text size
- Print article Print
- Jump to comments Comment
- Share this article Share
- Email article to a friend Email

By abstracting functionality from the operating environment, software frameworks will help organisations use cloud platforms
Software development frameworks play a pivotal role in the move to cloud computing
Only IT professionals working under a rock will have missed the monomaniacal obsession the industry has placed on cloud computing of late. But as ever, the amount of hype and debate has not necessarily correlated with adoption.
Uptake of software as a service, whereby whole applications are delivered over the Internet, has certainly been strong. A recent Gartner survey found that 95% of organisations intend to maintain or grow their SaaS usage in the coming year. But the same is not yet true for the other two constituents of the cloud computing spectrum, namely infrastructure as a service (IaaS), whereby raw computing resources such as processing and storage are delivered online, and platform as a service (PaaS), in which hosting providers allow users to build custom applications out of component services located in their data centres.
So far, IaaS adoption has been healthy but not earth shattering. Amazon Web Services, the segment’s market leader by some margin, will generate revenues of around $650 million in 2010 according to a recent estimate by investment bank Citigroup (Amazon does not reveal AWS sales itself). If accurate, this figure places AWS as a strong business but a drop in the ocean of the total IT infrastructure industry. Uptake of PaaS may be even more limited. According to Forrester analyst Stefan Ried, today the combined global PaaS market is worth “well below $1 billion”. However, he also predicts that by 2016, it will be worth over $15 billion.
One reason for the disparity in the adoption of the various flavours of cloud may be their different switching costs. For end-users, SaaS offerings are easy to adopt, as they typically employ user interfaces that are similar in style to consumer websites. But for software developers, the target audience of IaaS and PaaS offerings, working with the cloud can require a different set of skills and know-how, especially for those used to building traditional applications on client- server platforms.
This explains why software development frameworks – toolkits that allow programmers to be more productive by simplifying the development process – may well prove to be pivotal in the coming cloud era.
The rights of spring
In 2002, software developer Rod Johnson decided that building enterprise applications using the Java programming language was too difficult. He therefore constructed a framework, Spring, to make it simpler.
It does this by introducing a layer of abstraction between the functional code, which describes what the application actually does, and technical components that sit underneath it. This allows developers to perform essential but repetitive tasks, such as building in security checks or describing how different systems ‘talk’ to one another, much faster. “What Spring gives you is a way of cleanly separating the business logic that you write from its deployment environment,” explains Johnson.
Johnson made Spring publicly available under an open source licence, and in 2004 set up a company, SpringSource, to sell support and a paid-for enterprise edition. Today, according to Gartner estimates, Spring is used by over two million Java developers.
Most of the enterprise organisations that are using Spring today are attracted by the promise of productivity gains, Johnson says: “If you’ve got 5,000 developers, and you can get a 10% increase in productivity, you’re saving a lot of money.”
But by separating business logic from the deployment environment, these frameworks can also ease the move to new environments – such as the cloud – as they allow developers to transfer across both their legacy code and their development skills. “A framework is the surface area of a platform,” explains Johnson. “I really think that the cloud raises the importance of frameworks.”
This connection was identified by virtualisation software vendor and aspiring cloud-kingmaker VMware, which acquired SpringSource for $450 million in August 2009. VMware’s cloud strategy is to sell the hosting providers and enterprise organisations the software they require to operate their data centres in an elastically scalable fashion, in turn allowing them to charge for IT resources on a utility basis. This strategy recently bore fruit in the form of two important partnership announcements. In each case SpringSource plays a central role.
VMforce, a joint service from VMware and online CRM provider Salesforce.com announced in April 2010, allows developers to build applications on the latter’s PaaS offering using the Java programming language. The inclusion of SpringSource allows users to move legacy Java applications that have been built using Spring onto the Force.com platform.
Shortly after, Google stepped up its bid to attract enterprise application developers to its PaaS offering, the Google App Engine. As well as a new version of the service for businesses, the company announced a “cloud portability” initiative, again based on the SpringSource tool suite, to allow users to move Java applications between the App Engine and their own on-premise systems, or even competitive cloud offerings.
Redressing the balance
This might all sound like futuristic stuff, and in a sense it is: it will be some time before a significant proportion of enterprise applications go into production on PaaS offerings, with or without the aid of VMware’s SpringSource.
However, according to Forrester’s Ried, these aforementioned vendors are not plowing ahead on some untrodden technological path. In fact, he says, they are simply playing catch-up with a company whose cloud strategy is often dismissed as being behind the times: Microsoft.
Continued...






Interesting comparision of the Cloud players. There is alot of thrashing in this space and it is hard to determine which Cloud to goto as everyone is doing something a little different – its hard to
compare Cloud 2 Cloud. A similar diagnosis is by David Chappell:
"If I ruled the world”, says David Chappell, “I would make the phrase ‘private cloud’ illegal”. In conversation with David Gristwood, David Chappell, during his recent world tour, discusses the Cloud, its importance and role in the partner ecosystem, and cloud players, such as Google, Amazon, Salesforce.com, VMware and more. You can see his Cloud2Cloud comparison in brief here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7NHQdh8_uo
A more recent talk with David Chappell on this topic where he covers others issues such as:
- IaaS vs PaaS
- Private vs Public Cloud
- Applications that are not a great fit for the Cloud and those which are.
- The threat of Public Cloud to IT departments
see: http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/David+Gristwood/Conversations-with-David-Chappell-about-Windows-Azure-and-Cloud-Computing/
thoughts?
hope that helps,
Report this comment »-cn