Decision-making is an art and a science

CFOs and their teams have always worked hard to supply and analyse the data their companies need to be able to make solid, fact-based decisions. However, finance departments have long been constrained by basic forecasting techniques.

More often than not, the underlying data collection process is time consuming and error-prone, and the result often lacks depth, scope and quality. Not only is the underlying data unsatisfactory, but its processing is suboptimal. All these approximate figures end up being copied from spreadsheet to spreadsheet and undergo many manual transformations.

>See also: The digital ecosystem: IT infrastructure now on CEO’s agenda

This approach is obviously misleading:

Regardless of the quality of the forecasting process, if the data is not detailed, sufficient, relevant and up-to-date, the result will be inadequate.
The future is not a mere repeat of the past.
No lessons are learned from previous errors.

Digitisation now gives access to more granular and diverse data about present conditions or past situations and their outcomes. Any data set that may help describe, explain, predict or even determine a company’s positioning can now be stored, updated and processed.

This 360° view creates an opportunity to discover correlations between the collected data and the figures tracked by finance executives in their modelling activity. But to derive valuable knowledge from data diversity, the trend line methodology is not sufficient.

For the process of discovery to take place, this newly found trove of data needs to be mined with machine learning technology.

>See also: Procurement goes digital: technology, talent and insight

To put it simply, machine learning is the automated search for correlations or patterns within vast amounts of data. Once a statistically significant correlation is identified with a high degree of certainty, it may be applied to new data to predict an outcome.

Let’s take a simple example. Assume you are the CFO of a company that sells goods to other businesses and you want to anticipate your customer payment behaviour to prevent delays and accelerate your total inbound cash flow.

The traditional way would be to look at your past transactions and payment experiences with every significant customer and infer a probable date of payment for each of them.

But if you take another approach and look closer at your data, you may well find that your customer payment behaviours are not always consistent across time, that your historical view is missing some essential explanatory information about the customer’s behaviour that may or may not be specific to their relationship with your company. You end up shooting in the dark.

Wouldn’t your cash-in forecasts be much better if you had also correlated the actual time your customers took to pay you in the past, with detailed information about those transactions?

>See also: What’s stopping the insurance industry’s digitisation?

In theory, you cannot be sure that this model will perform well until you have run a machine learning algorithm on your own data, looking for predictive rules that relate each payment behaviour to the detailed information of the corresponding transaction orYou have tested the predictive power of those rules on a set of examples.

In fact, the forecast is likely to be much more accurate than with the traditional methodology, provided that the data you fed the algorithm with were representative of your entire customer base.

Which leads us to the next question: “can I find all this information about my past transactions while making sure they are representative?”

Unfortunately, most of this information may not be readily available internally, either because you’ve never collected them so far or they are not flowing through your existing order-to-cash process. For instance, it is unlikely that you know whether your customers pay their other suppliers late or not.

But SaaS platforms can capture most of this information for you and then machine learning software will then be able to discover the predictive rules and apply them to your own invoices to forecast their likely payment dates.

>See also: Digital transformation requires closer CFO-CIO alignment

But this is just a start. If inbound cash flows can be accurately deduced, so can most other key metrics, such as revenue, for instance, provided the data is available. CFOs are the ultimate source of truth in an organisation.

They manage the skilled resources who translate facts into numbers and confer them credibility. They are therefore the most legitimate and best equipped to tap from as many diverse data sources as available, leveraging the power of data science to accurately forecast what comes next and thus gain marketing insight and competitive advantage for their company.

Thus, with their augmented capabilities, CFOs are now poised to be the digital pilots of today’s new data-driven organisations.


Sourced by Jean-Cyril Schütterlé, ‎VP product & data science at Sidetrade


Nominations are now open for the Tech Leaders Awards 2017, the UK’s flagship celebration of the business, IT and digital leaders driving disruptive innovation and demonstrating value from the application of technology in businesses and organisations. Nominating is free and simply: just click here to enter. Good luck!

Avatar photo

Nick Ismail

Nick Ismail is a former editor for Information Age (from 2018 to 2022) before moving on to become Global Head of Brand Journalism at HCLTech. He has a particular interest in smart technologies, AI and...