How to ensure authenticity of consumer-generated content

With the growth of mobile usage reaching 1.5 billion of users globally, consumers today have easy access to content about a brand, its products and services, as well as tools to quickly create and share opinions, photos and videos across a variety of social media channels.

However, out of all this content, there have recently been numerous instances of brands fighting fraudulent forms of it. Amazon, for example, announced plans to sue 1,114 fake reviewers, claiming its brand reputation is being damaged by “false, misleading and inauthentic” reviews paid for by sellers seeking to improve the appeal of their product.

This is the second suit by the online retailer this year, clearly showing that the proliferation of fraudulent online reviews is becoming a critical issue for businesses to address.

>See also: The ‘rampant fraud’ of Amazon sellers exposed – and is an Amazon employee one of the culprits?

Yet people have not lost faith in online reviews – in fact, a recent survey revealed that online reviews impact 67.7% of consumers’ purchasing decisions. More than half of the respondents (54.7%) also admitted that online reviews are fairly, very or absolutely an important part of their decision-making process.

Brands therefore need to take actions to ensure consumers can still rely on and have access to only authentic consumer-generated content (CGC), such as reviews.

According to a Bazaarvoice survey, doubts persist regarding the integrity of review content, regardless of the type of website where it is displayed, with more than half of all respondents between the US and UK stating that they believe companies remove negative reviews. Furthermore, 50% of UK respondents expressed concerns that one or more of the reviews they read online is fake.

There is a mix of practices that can affect the trustworthiness of reviews, such as spam in many forms (i.e. automated submissions by bots, disruptive or trolling behaviour, commercial messages, illegitimate or degrading content by a client’s competitor), dishonest behaviour such as filtering, editing, or deleting reviews because they are negative or are lower rated.

Companies sometimes directly solicit positive reviews – for example, they might be incentivised (via discounts or other means) or authored by an employee without proper disclosures.

Manipulating reviews violates the most basic ethical practices a company can hold, as they can falsely affect consumers’ purchase decisions and damage the company’s reputation. Consumers have a fundamental right to trust the content they encounter, and moreover, businesses have a responsibility to ensure this content is legitimate.

In further research by Bazaarvoice, 84% of consumers stated that they would feel more trusting of reviews if they knew the reviews were screened for fraud, moderated, and displayed by a neutral, credible third party.

Almost half (45%) of respondents said they were more trusting of reviews that had passed through a technology filter and human analysis, but only 14% said a technology filter alone is sufficient.

Displaying some sort of industry mark – like a trust mark – along with consumer reviews, is a step brands should consider to demonstrate their commitment to authentic consumer feedback.

This will also help increase consumers’ trust towards online reviews – in fact, 47% of respondents said they would be more trusting of them if presented with a trust mark and an accompanying description of anti-fraud policies.

Authentic customer feedback has huge potential to positively influence buying intent and audience’s opinion. Brands seeking to improve their reputation, while staying ahead of the curve in a competitive landscape, can no longer overlook the importance and impact of engaging in consumers’ conversations, whether positive or negative, being transparent in their communications, and leveraging authentic consumer feedback.

Authentic CGC is a great opportunity for brands to build trust, and acquire more content that will lead to higher conversion rates and help create lasting, valuable relationships. The reality is that it’s no longer about traditional marketing results, such as conversions – people don’t want just a product or service, but are seeking an authentic experience.

Authentic customer feedback is also a precious form of R&D for brands and retailers –informing better business decisions, leading to innovation, and ameliorating the customer experience.

In today’s omnichannel age, brands need to fully understand their consumer audience and the most appropriate platforms through which to engage with them. They need to go where conversations happen, with CGC being an evolution of these conversations.

The influence of reviews on consumers’ purchasing behaviour can no longer be ignored, and businesses need to take a lead in calling for transparency and commitment to deliver a positive shopping experience.

>See also: The real cost of online reviews to businesses – and how to deal with them

Authenticity is fundamental to the value of these reviews, and companies must recognise that doing everything within their power to leverage only authentic content can enable them to elevate their brand above the competition.

Amazon’s intentions with this latest lawsuit are good and are a strong first step in changing consumer behaviour. However, brands need to address the underlying issue that the system in place today allows for this type of fraudulent behaviour.

Brands need to work towards an environment where all stakeholders can trust the authenticity of online content. The way to affect the ecosystem is to challenge the online status quo by focusing on one authentic conversation at a time.


Sourced from Prelini Udayan-Chiechi, Bazaarvoice

Avatar photo

Ben Rossi

Ben was Vitesse Media's editorial director, leading content creation and editorial strategy across all Vitesse products, including its market-leading B2B and consumer magazines, websites, research and...

Related Topics