Flash storage prices are surging – why auto-tiering is now essential

This article explores what you should do now that flash storage is becoming unsustainable for organisations


  • The global storage market is undergoing a shift and the result is a widening cost gap between flash and HDD that is pushing the industry back toward more traditional storage economics.
  • For years, data reduction technologies such as compression and deduplication masked the real economics of flash.
  • The rise in ransomware attacks also helped drive flash adoption. Organisations sought faster backups, quicker restores, and higher snapshot retention. Flash delivered these benefits, but the economics are breaking under current pricing conditions.
  • The market is clearly moving toward a hybrid approach built around intelligent tiering. The market is clearly moving toward a hybrid approach built around intelligent tiering.

The global storage market is undergoing a shift that few predicted and no one can ignore. Flash prices are rising at a pace not seen in more than a decade, supply constraints are mounting, and key components are becoming harder to source. The result is a widening cost gap between flash and HDD that is pushing the industry back toward more traditional storage economics.

This is not an issue that only hyperscalers or massive data centres need to worry about. The effects extend to every corner of the market. Any organisation purchasing storage, whether it is a few terabytes or many petabytes, is now paying significantly more for the same amount of flash. The increase delivers no new performance benefit, and the trend shows no sign of reversing. Forecasts indicate continued pressure as demand for flash in AI and cloud environments outpaces the industry’s ability to produce it. 

We are entering a period where organisations must rethink how they balance performance and capacity. The economic model that supported widespread all-flash adoption is breaking down, and a more efficient approach is now required. Intelligent auto-tiering, once considered a niche strategy, has become the most realistic path forward for maintaining performance without facing unsustainable cost increases.

Flash vs. HDD: the price gap is becoming unsustainable

For nearly two years, flash and HDD maintained a cost ratio of roughly 1:4. This unusually narrow gap helped accelerate all-flash adoption, even for workloads that did not truly demand it. The financial penalty for placing everything on flash felt small enough to overlook.

That period is over. In a matter of months, the price gap has widened to 1:6, with industry expectations of 1:10 in the coming year. This is not a brief correction. It reflects a structural imbalance between supply and demand. Exabyte-scale AI infrastructure and global cloud expansion require massive quantities of flash, and current manufacturing capacity cannot keep up. In any market where supply tightens and demand rises; pricing follows the same pattern. Every organisation, regardless of size, is now dealing with that reality.

The hidden problem: data reduction does not work everywhere

For years, data reduction technologies such as compression and deduplication masked the real economics of flash. Vendors relied on high reduction ratios to present attractive prices and to justify all-flash deployments.

But many workloads do not reduce well, including:

  • Backup targets
  • Medical imaging archives
  • AI training datasets and vector databases
  • Surveillance and media content
  • Large, unstructured data sets

When data cannot be compressed or deduped effectively, the organisation is forced to pay the full cost of raw flash capacity. As flash prices climb by 60 to 120 percent, these environments become increasingly difficult to justify from a cost perspective.

Most data is cold. Flash was never meant to store it

Across industries and use cases, a consistent pattern emerges. The majority of data becomes cold shortly after it is created. It is written once, accessed briefly, then retained for long periods without meaningful activity. Cold data does not require low latency, high IOPS, expensive endurance ratings or premium, power-intensive performance tiers. It only needs to be stored reliably at the lowest reasonable cost. Yet during the years when flash was only marginally more expensive than HDD, many organisations placed cold data on flash systems simply because the price difference felt manageable. With today’s economics, that model can no longer scale.

Ransomware pressures are adding to the cost problem

The rise in ransomware attacks also helped drive flash adoption. Organisations sought faster backups, quicker restores, and higher snapshot retention. Flash delivered these benefits, but the economics are breaking under current pricing conditions.

Today, the cost of flash-based backup appliances is rising, long-term retention on flash is becoming unsustainable, and maintaining deep histories on premium media no longer aligns with budget expectations. 

Organisations still need rapid recovery, but the underlying storage model for retaining this data must evolve. 

The only scalable path forward: modern auto-tiering that blends flash and HDD without compromise

The market is clearly moving toward a hybrid approach built around intelligent tiering. This is not the tiering of the past. Modern auto-tiering operates at the block level, in real time, and without administrative intervention.

A sustainable model includes the following principles. 

High performance when needed, low cost when not

Flash remains the right choice for hot data, I/O-intensive workloads, analytics, real-time processing, and AI feature extraction. As data cools, it moves automatically to high-density HDD. The user experience remains consistent, while overall storage cost falls dramatically.

Zero manual management

True auto-tiering should be completely autonomous. It must provide continuous optimisation, transparent data movement, consistent latency for active workloads, and no need to classify or migrate data manually. The goal is simple: the organisation experiences flash-level performance, even though most data resides on lower-cost media.

One system, not multiple silos

Legacy tiering approaches required one flash system, one HDD system, and software that attempted to knit them together. This created integration overhead, multiple management interfaces, and unnecessary complexity.

A modern architecture must operate within one unified platform, with one namespace, one management layer, and one lifecycle.

Freedom to scale as drive densities increase

HDD capacities are growing quickly, heading toward 30 TB, 40 TB and beyond. Organisations need architectures that accept different drive sizes, support asymmetric expansion, and avoid disruptive upgrades. These capabilities are essential for capturing the cost benefits of next-generation HDD technologies. 

Even all-flash environments benefit from tiering

Even in environments where flash remains the primary performance tier, tiering plays an important role. Long-term snapshot retention, ransomware protection, and archival depth can be maintained at far lower cost when older snapshots or blocks move automatically into a secondary tier within the same system. 

The AI era requires storage efficiency, not storage excess

The current flash pricing crisis is more than a temporary spike. It signals a long-term shift in storage economics driven by accelerating AI demand, constrained supply chains, and global data growth. The all-flash mindset of the past decade is now colliding with financial realities that organisations can no longer ignore.

Cold data should not be placed on expensive media. Workloads that do not compress or dedupe well should not be forced into high-cost environments. And organisations should not pay for peak performance where it is not required.

A more efficient, tiered approach is now essential. Intelligent auto-tiering provides the performance of flash when it is needed and the economics of HDD when it is not. In an era defined by massive data expansion and unpredictable component pricing, efficiency has moved from a best practice to a strategic imperative.

Gal Naor is CEO of StorONE.

Read more

Data storage problems and how to fix them – Digitising data storage can be a daunting task and some of the biggest barriers businesses face are with infrastructure, costs, security, compliance and people, says Kubair Shirazee, founder of AgiliTea

Making sense of data sovereignty and how to regain it – As businesses rely more on digital tools, staying in control of your data matters more than ever

Overcoming data loss from embedded devices – Finland-headquartered data storage start-up Tuxera looks to mitigate embedded device data loss and bottlenecks through file system software

Avatar photo

Gal Naor

Gal Naor is co-founder and CEO of StorONE.

Related Topics

Data