The legal action, which has been filed in a San Francisco federal court, accuses generative AI startup OpenAI of stealing the data of millions of internet users — including children — without proper permission, reported Bloomberg.
16 named plantiffs collectively claim that private information from individuals’ interactions with ChatGPT and DALL-E integrations has been illegally accessed, which if proved to be true would breach legislation including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act — a law that has precedent for web scraping cases.
The almost 160-page complaint comments: “Despite established protocols for the purchase and use of personal information, defendants took a different approach: theft.”
Generative AI: a blessing or a curse for cybersecurity? — Exploring the benefits and risks that generative AI capabilities will bring for cybersecurity, now and in the future.
Balancing creativity with guardrails
In reaction to this development, Vered Horesh, chief strategic AI partnerships at generative AI visuals company Bria, said: “The crucial issue of data sourcing for this technology cannot be overlooked.
“In our collective interest, we must advocate for the responsible procurement of data powering Generative AI, without stifling human creativity. If we diminish incentives for human original expression, what substance will be left to fuel AI?
“It is imperative to establish legal and business frameworks fostering an environment where human creativity and progress not only coexist but thrive.”
ChatGPT vs GDPR – what AI chatbots mean for data privacy — While OpenAI’s ChatGPT is taking the large language model space by storm, there is much to consider when it comes to data privacy.